Talk:The Amityville Horror (2005 film)

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Chicago Low‑importance

	Chicago portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chicago, which aims to improve all articles or pages related to Chicago or the Chicago metropolitan area.ChicagoWikipedia:WikiProject ChicagoTemplate:WikiProject ChicagoChicago
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Film: American

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.

Horror Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Horror, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to fictional horror in film, literature and other media on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit one of the articles mentioned below, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.HorrorWikipedia:WikiProject HorrorTemplate:WikiProject Horrorhorror
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

Was there a daughter named Jodie in the DeFeo family?

The murder?

Anyone knows anything about the real case of mass murder? -- Toytoy 00:38, Jun 7, 2005 (UTC)

Since admitted to being a hoax by Weber and the Lutzes. -Fuzzy 21:22, 22 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Merger

Much of what is here is already on The Amityville Horror. Since the movie is essentially the same as the book, much of the info here is duplicated on that page, and I feel that this page could easily be merged. Any Thoughts? Gershwinrb 06:27, 31 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:The Amityville Horror poster.JPG

Image:The Amityville Horror poster.JPG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 06:29, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sequel

I was on The New York Times website one day and I looked up The Amityville Horror 2 (2010) an article came up and said it was announced. I went to look for it as a reference and it's not there, or I didn't do it right. I found another site that has some info on it. Could someone find more references for it.--VampireKen (talk) 17:13, 2 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Differences between 2005, original, and book

First, per WP:MOSFILM#Adaptation from source material, we should not be merely listing the differences between this film and another film, or even this film and the original source material. Real world context needs to be provided (e.g., why they chose to change something, how people reacted to those changes, etc.). So, there can be no personal observations sourced by the films themselves, or the books. The entire section, as it stands right now, probably needs to be removed until sources that discuss the reasons for the changes (you may find them on the DVD bonus features) can be attained. Reactions to said changes in a film can usually be found by critics who remember the original film, or the source material. BIGNOLE (Contact me) 16:22, 28 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]