Wikipedia:Requests for comment/66.117.217.78
In order to remain listed at Wikipedia:Requests for comment, at least two people need to show that they tried to resolve a dispute with this user and have failed. This must involve the same dispute, not different disputes. The persons complaining must provide evidence of their efforts, and each of them must certify it by signing this page with ~~~~. If this does not happen within 48 hours of the creation of this dispute page (which was: 19:32, 23 Aug 2004 (UTC)) the page will be deleted. The current date and time is: 00:00, 27 December 2024 (UTC).
- (66.117.217.78 | talk | contributions)
Statement of the dispute
[edit]This is a summary written by users who dispute this user's conduct.
- Description:
Star Wars community members and Wikipedia community members have agreed that the proper class names for the two ships described in Imperial Star Destroyer and Super Star Destroyer are "Imperator-class" and "Executor-class" respectively (although the titles of the articles are valid and the most common terms used). The anonymous user in question is continually reverting those two articles, as well as Star Destroyer, to a version of his stating that the class names are "Imperial-class" and "Super-class" as well as removing other legitimate portions of the article. Attempts have been made to communicate with him, but have failed.
- Evidence of disputed behavior:
- Super Star Destroyer article history (please note that three of the anon's edits are blankings and therefore exempt from the 3RR when reverted)
- Partial blanking of Super Star Destroyer
- Complete blanking of Super Star Destroyer
- Another partial blanking of Super Star Destroyer
- Imperial Star Destroyer article history
- Star Destroyer article history
- Blanking of user talk page
- Applicable policies:
- Evidence of trying and failing to resolve the dispute:
- Users certifying the basis for this dispute (sign with ~~~~):
- Other users who endorse this summary (sign with ~~~~):
Response
[edit]This is a summary written by the user whose conduct is disputed, or by other users who think that the dispute is unjustified and that the above summary is biased or incomplete.
{Add summary here, but you must use the endorsement section below to sign. Users who edit or endorse this summary should not edit the other summaries}
Users who endorse this summary (sign with ~~~~):
Outside view
[edit]This is a summary written by users not directly involved with the dispute but who would like to add an outside view of the dispute.
{Add summary here, but you must use the endorsement section below to sign. Users who edit or endorse this summary should not edit the other summaries}
Users who endorse this summary (sign with ~~~~):
Discussion
[edit]All signed comments and talk not related to a vote or endorsement, should be directed to this page's discussion page.